The Chinese government to the outside world seems to be controlling and offers no freedom to its Chinese citizens. Whereas , in certain eyes the government is just doing what is best for China and its citizens. A few days ago the government detained a well-known Chinese artist. It was unclear what the reasons for him being detained were, until now.
Who is this person?
A man called Ai
WeiWei; the man is famous for his artistic skills and for the design of the Beijing Olympic Stadium. Ai Weiwei is also known as an activist; a rebel; someone who is always fighting the governement. Ai Weiwei thinks that the governement is corrupted and there were cover ups after the earthquake in southern China in 2008. He has made it his mission to find out what it was that the government is hiding from that earthquake and why.
Ai Weiwei is a person who is renown across the world. When he was detained it had caused a global row. The only news which was released was that Weiwei was aressted at Beijing airport on Sunday while he was trying to board a flight to Hong Kong. The reason for his arrest is unknown, where he has gone is still unknown.
Why?
Ai has been arrested for protesting; speaking out; fighting for freedom or any form of human rights. This time he has been done for economic crimes. However, according to a reporter from CNN.news, if the government is trying to target a person but has no evidence to bring them in or down then the local police would work alongside the government to charge this person for an "economic crime".
An "economic crime" can be anything from tax evasion to corruption to discredit them publicly.
A question which runs through my mind is why on a global factor has Mr Weiwei affected so many countries. With him being arrested; why are they involving themselves in a situation which is not theirs; but on the other hand this could be a good thing. Even though China wants to shut themselves away from the world and keep themselves to themselves, this does not put off other countries from interfering.
But could this be that the Chinese government is trying too hard to maintain peoples order and freedom of speech, or is it that they are scared of what more Weiwei could say. What is it that the Chinese government is afraid of? Could it be that the government has taken things too far?
The investigation continues.
References
http://business.blogs.cnn.com/2011/04/08/chinese-artist-ai-weiwei-economic-criminal/

China's social networking service (SNS) market size has exceeded RMB 1 billion in 2010, having grown more than 200% compared with 2009. Astonishingly, the figure is expected to double again in 2011.
It is no wonder that soon after Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg was selected by Time magazine as Person of the Year 2010, he set off to China to meet with the top management of Baidu Inc., China Mobile Ltd., Sina Corporation and Alibaba.com Ltd. By contrast, he did not hold talks with the management teams of archrivals such as Tencent Holdings Limited, Kaixin001.com, Renren.com and 51.com.s
Although the details of his China trip were kept strictly confidential, Facebook certainly cannot afford to leave the Chinese market unattended. Strangely, despite a new sales office in Hong Kong, Facebook says it currently has no plans for China. Is that true? We highly doubt so. Like Zuckerberg previously said “how can you connect the world without connecting 1.3 billion people in China?” We are sure Facebook has plans for China but it isn’t ready to release its strategy.

China counts as an exciting but potentially hazardous market for Facebook. With the world's largest Internet population, China has already proved to be a Waterloo for many big US Internet companies, such as eBay and MySpace. Money and technology are no guarantee of victory here.
If Facebook officially enters the Chinese market, it can choose either to work alone or with a well-connected local partner? The first option is not likely to be successful. And Zuckerberg himself seems to be aware of this.
Facebook’s main competitors in the Chinese market are so-called Facebook clones that have been here for years, one of the most dominant being RenRen. RenRen has 170 million registered users at the end of 2010, largely due to significant localization of the site to Chinese tastes, something it might be difficult for a multinational brand like Facebook to do.
Besides fierce local competition, Facebook will encounter another serious challenge here: censorship. China’s social networks ( RenRen, Kaixin001, etc.) employ long ban lists of sensitive terms (both political and pornographic) and warehouses full of manual censors (who click through images and videos for sensitive content all day long). All “cooperate” with government requests. Consequently, we can foresee the articles, “NYT Interview with One of Facebook’s 1000 Censors in China” and “The 50,000+ Terms That Facebook Blocks You from Sharing with your Chinese Friends.”
Facebook does censor in other nations (e.g, Germany (Nazis) and Pakistan (images of the prophet)), but limited to a few extreme cases. And which Western internet service with user-generated content has succeeded in appeasing the Chinese government anyway? Google’s content is far less sensitive and even that went too far for them.
Zuckerberg is in China. An R&D office is conceivable. Facebook China? Not so clear.
Facebook.com has more than 500 million active users worldwide (July 2010) and is considered by many internet users across the globe to be the dominant social networking website; Hollywood have even made a film about its creation (The Social Network – based on the early development of Facebook by Zuckerberg will be released on 1st October 2010). However, usage of Facebook is small compared to other social networking sites frequented by the 420 million internet users in China.

The Chinese government first started regulating the internet in 1993, with the central aim of neutralizing critical online opinion. In 2009 the social networking sites Facebook and Twitter were banned due to the social and political commentary published on them. Western audiences may view the banning of social networking websites such as Facebook, Twitter and MySpace as a horrible deprivation of another western right and an outrageous censorship of the media by the Chinese government. The other side to this view would be that internet users in China don’t need the West’s precious Facebooks and Twitters – they have their own equivalents, which considering the access ban, trump Facebook every time. The most popular social networking site in China is Qzone with approximately 388 million Chinese users, followed by 51.com with 160 million users and Ren Ren at 120 million users. Online social networking and micro-blogging (Twitter-type activity) is a big part of Chinese Internet use, though not via familiar western websites.
Some believe the Chinese government are keen to keep give their domestic enterprise an advantage by minimising external competition. Domestic organisations can also be easier to control and the government are wary of the power of social networking sites to bring together groups and ideas. A specific government bureau is employed to monitor activity on social networking sites. One outcome of this policy is a reduction in the variety of competition, an essential element in driving motivation for the improvement of services and encouraging innovation to create new and better technology, all of which keep a market moving forward.
Nonetheless, the competition between domestic Chinese sites is fierce, but it should also be noted that many Chinese Internet users are a member of more than 1 SNS (2.8 sites on average according to the Chinese Internet Network Information Centre). Aside from the big three Chinese online social networks, there are also many other smaller Chinese sites competing for usage. All these factors make the Chinese online social networking market difficult to crack, especially by a Western company such as Facebook.
The use of social networking sites differs between countries and cultures. For instance, the way that social networking sites are used to promote brands and products in the West is considerably different to China. Social networking sites are designed locally to suit the people using them. Therefore it would be ineffective to just take a global social networking site, such as Facebook, and simply localise it to Chinese culture through mere translation alone. Social networking sites looking to break into the Chinese market need to be very in tune with Chinese culture, values and the current phenomena in online social networking.
According to Facebook there are more than 70 translations available on their site and approximately 70% of Facebook users are outside the United States. Facebook users are increasing in other parts of Asia such as Indonesia and Malaysia, but Facebook is still insignificant in China. The government legislation which bans access to Facebook plays a part in its minimal number of users, as prior to the banning, Facebook users were increasing in China.
Zuckerburg, co-founder of Facebook, recently outlined the company’s plans to move into Asia markets with an aim to acquire 500 million users in Asia over the next 5 years. Aside from the small issue of legalising access to Facebook in China, Zuckerburg and co. will still have to entice existing users from the likes of Qzone and Ren Ren; a challenging feat even for a multi-million dollar company such as Facebook.
Research has shown that the specific use of social networking websites varies between countries. In China there is a larger focus on social network gaming, thus in order for Facebook to become as popular as existing Chinese social networks it may need to adapt its applications and services to meet the needs of the Chinese social network consumer. For instance, approximately 68 million Chinese people spend a significant amount of time playing online games - of which 88 percent do so via social networks, according to a survey conducted by Niko Partners (March 2010). The online gaming industry in China is big business and the big social networking sites provide free access to a huge range, including the most popular ones such as Happy Farm, a version of which is also available on Facebook. Facebook can learn from the Chinese social networking sites with regards to gaming and improve the gaming applications it offers. This sort of adaption and improvement can be good for the industry as it offers internet users more choice and better services, as websites must keep standards high to compete for users.
There are other differences between the Western and Chinese social networking sites. Though Ren Ren was initially thought of as a copy of Facebook there are aspects of Ren Ren which are different and potentially better than Facebook. For example, Ren Ren provides a writing application to express your thoughts, similar to a journal, whereas Facebook only lets you do this through short “statuses”. This allows users to be a lot more proactive and expressive in their online social networking. Another big difference between Facebook and Ren Ren is the privacy. Ren Ren allows users to see who has visited their profiles; this is not the case on Facebook. Though some would argue that Facebook is right to keep their users’ activity private, others believe that this decreases mindless browsing and encourages people to only use Ren Ren to communicate with people they have a genuine connection with.
Online social networking in China is very well established and even if the government were to remove the censorship of sites such as Facebook and Twitter, it would not guarantee a massive increase in Chinese members. Facebook are aware of the challenges they face to break into Asia and particularly China. The unblocking of western social networking sites could be beneficial for both Chinese and Western sites as they learn from each other’s strengths and weaknesses. It will be interesting to see how they meet these challenges and what the markets can learn from each other to shape the future of world-wide online social networking.
Josephine Seymour

Facebook will be looking to expand its growth across China, Russia, Japan and South Korea in the near future. With almost 500 million members currently, they are looking at the above regions to help reach their target of 1 billion users.
It will be interesting to see what steps the social media will take in order to get there, considering that in each of these regions already has its own established networks like RenRen & Kaixin001 in China, V Kontakte in Russia, Mixi in Japan and Cyworld in South Korea.
Mark Zuckerberg told an audience of marketers that "for the first time we are focused on doing some specific things in specific countries". So far, the growth of Facebook is largely due to organic growth. However, there was nothing specific about what these "things" are going to be. But a good guess would be to first get it unblocked by the GFW.

The latest numbers are evident. I do not have a strong VPN in order to access insidefacebook.com. But sourcing from this article, traffic has dropped from 1m active users in July this year, half a million in August, 41,000 in early September and finally - only 14,000 as of early October. All thanks to the Great (Fire)wall of China.